Template — no client

How a case study on this site will read

No engagement is described here. This is the shape a real case study will take, written out in full so the format can be agreed before the first one is.

Published Approved by nobody yet — this is the proposal being reviewed

A creator’s studio at night: blank hoodies folded on a steel table, a ring light, and shipping boxes stacked behind

What was measured

Brief to first sample
00 daysIllustrative onlyCalendar days from a signed brief to a physical sample in the client's hands. Per engagement.
Sell-through at day 30
00%Illustrative onlyUnits sold divided by units produced, thirty days after the drop opens. First 30 days.
Addressable fan records
0Illustrative onlyBuyers and scanners who consented to be contacted again, deduplicated. Per engagement.

What a case study here will always state

Four things, in this order, on every one:

  • Who the client was and what they asked for, in their words where we have them and paraphrased where we do not. A case study that cannot say what was asked for is a portfolio piece.
  • What we actually did, split by the part of the operation that did it — strategy and creative, sourcing and production, commerce and fulfilment — so a reader can tell which parts they would be buying.
  • What happened, measured. Every figure carries its definition, its period and its basis. A number without those three is decoration.
  • What we would do differently. A case study with no second thoughts in it is marketing.

What it will never state

  • A number we cannot define. If we cannot say how it was calculated, it does not appear.
  • A projection presented as a result. basis on every metric is historical, projected or illustrative, and the page prints which.
  • A client’s name without their written agreement to the exact wording. approvalOwner names the person who checked it, and the build refuses a case study without one.
  • Margin, rate-card or supplier terms.

The decisions inside this

Three, and they are the reason this page exists rather than an empty shelf:

  1. Anonymous case studies, or named only. Named is stronger and slower. Anonymous lets us publish sooner and convinces less. The proposal is: named only, and we wait.
  2. Metrics on every case study, or only where they are good. Publishing only the good ones is how a work page stops being evidence. The proposal is: metrics on all of them, defined, including the unflattering ones.
  3. How soon after a drop closes we publish. The proposal is thirty days, so day-30 sell-through is a real number rather than a forecast.

What we ran

  • Strategy + creative
  • Source + make
  • Sell + deliver

Agree the format

Start a drop